I can remember the first time I heard Girl Talk. I was in the back of my brother’s friend’s car, with my brother Matt, and his friend Max early in the year. We had been cruising around Saskatoon for an evening over a holiday of sorts that escapes me at the moment, and decided to take a little break from driving. Max pulled out his iPod that had been attached to his car stereo and had decided to change the music for the 13th time in our 30 minute drive, and switched it to some beat-blasted hip-hop. At first I was not thrilled. I was not thrilled because hip-hop, rap, and R&B are not typical genres that I find myself listening to. I am more of a punk, screamo, hardcore, indie, type guy. But after listening to a few seconds of this hip-hop song that Max was playing, it changed. It changed in a sense that this was no longer the same song. It came full picture as many songs mashed together to create a new one. Some songs I recognized, others I didn’t but I was not concerned with that because in all honesty the music was unbelievably catchy. Max had made me a believer in hip-hop… at least, aspects of it.
For those who are unaware, Girl Talk is a mash-up artist, some might say. He samples music from hundreds of different songs from classic rock to gangsta rap and edits them, mixing them all together to form a whole once again. In his songs, he can use as many as 25+ different tracks to make a new one. It requires an extraordinary degree of technique and knowledge (and in my opinion, brilliance) to be able to figure out what songs and what samples will fit with what, and then be able to mix them all together.
Not to mention the fact that it just straight up takes guts. What Girl Talk, or Gregg Gillis is doing is illegal. At any given point, he could be fined millions for the songs he’s used in his music without permission or consent from the owner. For more information on this subject, there is a documentary which surrounds Girl Talk and the current copyright controversy at www.opensourcecinema.org
The documentary featured is entitled RIP: A Remix Manifesto
Gregg Gillis’ situation reminds me of a movie I saw recently entitled A Flash of Genius. This movie is based on the true story of Robert Kearns, the man who invented the intermittent windshield wiper and fought in court for years defending the basic idea that he had taken everyday engineering parts and put them together to create something new. That “something new” was a windshield wiper that works in intervals, as opposed to always being just “on”. The motor company Ford would end up stealing Kearns’ invention and market it as their own, which would eventually spawn the court case. Ford claimed that Kearns had not created anything new. He had just used parts that are widely available and put them together in a different manner. Kearns defended himself in court to explain that just because the parts he used were not new doesn’t mean that what he made with them was not also new. He related his case to something as simple as forming words. Although no letter in the english language is new, the letters are being rearranged all the time to form NEW words with NEW uses and meanings.
This is, in a nutshell, what Greg Gillis’ issue is as well, except he’s dealing with music as opposed to engineering parts. The music Gregg is using as well is unfortunately in the hands of some of the biggest corporate media giants in the world. So, Gillis’ and Kearns’ problems differ in ways.
However, Gillis’ is being very creative in how he gets his music to the public. In letting the public download his newest album absolutely FREE from his myspace page, he is not actually making a profit from his creations. Furthermore, he has set up his myspace page so that, if you feel inclined, you can DONATE money to Gillis. $10 will get you a hard copy of the album. Essentially, you’re not paying for the album or the music. You’re simply donating to Greg Gillis for his efforts and he is giving you a hard copy of his album for your generosity. Or, as I said before, you can download it for free. Literally.
I tried both. Got the digital download for free, and also got the hard copy in the mail after donating $10.
Given that Greg Gillis is, whether you’d like to admit or not, an artist, he would fit the perfect profile for a case to study in a music classroom. Especially in dealing with cultural elements. His music is under fire, but why, exactly? Is there just purpose for Gillis to pay millions of dollars to companies that “own” the music he’s using just so he can create his own? A main point in RIP: A Remix Manifesto is that culture always builds on the past. People are inspired by something they have seen, heard, read, experienced and from that inspiration comes a new art work. This is the way it has been for hundreds if not thousands of years. That is why some people say nothing is really NEW anymore, things are just being recycled or reused to form “seemingly” new things. The real argument is: is it new or not? When you take Robert Kearns case, what he created was indeed new, and he eventually proved that point in court.
When you listen to Girl Talk, you will realize that he is using no more than mere seconds of song clips to fill his own, and by no means would someone download his music to claim that they own a song that had been used in Girl Talk’s song. So why is it such a big issue? Is it because of laws that are in place that are out-dated in our day and age? Is it pure greed on the part of corporate America? It feels as though Western culture has this tremendous fear of change which could either cost us the progression of art, or the progression of media business.
Which have we survived without longer? Creations or corporations?